
This article first appeared in The Edge Malaysia Weekly on October 12, 2026 - October 18, 2026
Datasonic Group Bhd’s (KL:DATASONIC) decision to terminate its proposed acquisition of an industrial property in Petaling Jaya, Selangor, raises questions about its expansion plans and the circumstances surrounding the failed deal.
Last week, the security-related technology solutions provider announced that it had terminated a sale and purchase agreement signed on July 10 last year after the seller Pixio Sdn Bhd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Singapore-listed mDR Ltd, failed to obtain a fire certificate from the Fire and Rescue Department for the property. The property, comprising a two-storey factory, a three-storey office block and a two-storey warehouse on 6,182.5 sq m of land, was priced at RM28.5 million.
While Datasonic received a refund of its deposit, the termination raises several questions. Why was the failure to secure the fire certificate sufficient to derail the acquisition? Was the property facing significant fire safety compliance issues, or were there other obstacles that made it impractical for the seller to obtain the necessary approval?
An existing industrial building may require modifications or upgrades to meet fire safety requirements. However, without further details, it would be premature to conclude whether the outstanding certification represented a straightforward regulatory hurdle or a more significant underlying issue.
More importantly, what does the aborted deal mean for Datasonic’s expansion plans?
The group had previously said the property would boost production capacity and efficiency, strengthen its competitive position and provide greater scalability to support existing and future projects. Losing the site could force Datasonic to seek alternatives, potentially delaying these objectives.
Financially, Datasonic reported a net cash position of RM20.1 million at end-June 2026, with cash of RM51.6 million and borrowings of RM31.5 million, plus short-term investments of RM79.7 million.
Datasonic should clarify whether alternative premises are being considered and whether it can secure a suitable replacement without compromising its expansion timeline or incurring additional costs. Investors deserve greater visibility into the implications of a deal that has come undone after more than a year, solely because the seller failed to obtain a fire certificate.
Save by subscribing to us for your print and/or digital copy.
P/S: The Edge is also available on Apple's App Store and Android's Google Play.