Monday 05 Oct 2026
main news image

This article first appeared in The Edge Malaysia Weekly on April 20, 2026 - April 26, 2026

MALAYSIAN solar energy players have seen their share prices rebound 40% to 50% from their March lows as renewed concerns about global energy supply, triggered by the Iran conflict, lift sentiment on renewable energy (RE).

The rising prices of natural gas, a key input for power generation, are prompting businesses and households to reconsider solar adoption as a hedge against higher electricity costs, say industry players.

On Bursa Malaysia, Solarvest Holdings Bhd (KL:SLVEST) has surged about 49% from its March trough, pushing its forward price-earnings ratio (PER) to about 32 times, above its historical average of 22 times. Samaiden Group Bhd (KL:SAMAIDEN) and Pekat Group Bhd (KL:PEKAT) have also seen their share price rally, gaining 38% and 43% respectively, with valuations expanding to 22 and 23 times forward earnings, above their long-term average of 17 and 18 times.

Market attention is shifting back to private sector demand, particularly among high-consumption users who are increasingly motivated to switch to solar,  Pekat managing director Chin Soo Mau tells The Edge. “The commercial and industrial (C&I) segment remains the most attractive in the near term,” he says.

The industry had seen a slowdown before the Iran war following the tariff restructuring under Regulatory Period 4 (RP4), which introduced capacity and network charges that apply even to on-site solar users. This has reduced the overall savings for new adopters compared with those who installed under earlier programmes.

The impact is most pronounced in the residential segment under the Solar Accelerated Transition Action Programme (Solar ATAP), introduced on Jan 1 this year. Unlike previous frameworks that allowed for full bill offset, Solar ATAP enables households to offset only about 60% of their total electricity costs. Consequently, payback periods have stretched to as long as eight years, from about five years previously.

Still, that equation could change quickly if fuel costs rise. The Automatic Fuel Adjustment (AFA), projected at a rebate of 0.08 sen per kWh for July — its lowest since it was introduced — is widely expected to increase should global energy prices climb.

This is prompting “overwhelming interest” even among residential users as the prospect of higher fuel costs becomes real, says Gading Kencana Sdn Bhd group managing director Datuk Guntor Tobeng. “In a high energy cost environment, the savings are still significant, especially for larger households,” he adds, noting a recent surge in enquiries after a subdued start to the year.

It is a reversal from the lull in January and February, when the market was still digesting Solar ATAP and RP4.

“We were preparing for a slowdown in demand and concentrated all efforts on ongoing solar farm projects. Now, we need to add to our sales team,” says Guntor.

The recent rebound in the solar sector has, however, yet to match last year’s surge, when consumers rushed to lock in installations ahead of changes to non-energy charges for approvals from 2026 onwards and to capture residential rebates.

Interest hinges on price

Demand is still highly sensitive to whether solar can deliver meaningful bill savings, with conversion rates lagging even as enquiries improve, says oil and gas firm Uzma Bhd (KL:UZMA), which operates large-scale solar farms and installs rooftop systems.

“Interest is there, but conversion is taking longer while customers reassess savings. Higher grid tariff expectations are lifting sentiment, but the market is not yet back to last year’s momentum,” it adds.

Uzma notes that the sector is currently navigating a transition, following the discontinuation of the Net Energy Metering (NEM 3.0) programme, the introduction of the new RP4 tariff structure and the rollout of the Solar ATAP scheme.

“To say it is complex is an understatement. The market is still trying to process the fundamental shift in tariffs and the different solar policies,” says Arjun Arasu, CEO of TIME Energy Sdn Bhd, a unit of TIME dotCom Bhd (KL:TIMECOM).

Pekat’s Chin says confusion over the mechanics of the programme — including NEM-to-ATAP transitions, self-consumption (SelCo) versus ATAP choices and export credit calculations — has become a key drag on adoption. He adds that clearer government communication could help improve uptake.

Samaiden managing director Datuk Chow Pui Hee says customers are likely to remain cautious in the near term. “They may want to wait and see whether the cost increase is temporary before committing,” she adds.

Fuel price volatility remains a key uncertainty, with potential declines reducing the attractiveness of solar installations. Meanwhile, the recent rebound in solar panel prices could lift system cost, even though prices are near historical lows after years of decline.

While renewable electricity is expected to command a premium over fossil fuels, supporting infrastructure such as carbon pricing and emissions monitoring is still not mature enough, with tools such as emissions monitoring or carbon tax, which could help encourage consumers to transition, yet to be rolled out.

Alternative pathways are competing for demand. Some users are instead opting for Tenaga Nasional Bhd’s (KL:TENAGA) Green Electricity Tariff (GET), which offers certified RE at a surcharge of three to five sen per kWh.

Like Solar ATAP, other programmes have constraints too. Larger SelCo installations comes with compulsory battery storage, which nearly doubles the cost, as well as additional standby charges of 12 sen/kWh.

However, C&I users are increasingly adding battery storage to manage peak demand charges — called peak shaving — through load shaving strategies.

In corporate markets, potential participants in schemes such as the Corporate Renewable Energy Supply Scheme (CRESS) are increasingly benchmarking solar costs against existing electricity tariffs, with some able to pass on higher AFA costs to customers.

Government data shows that in the residential market, the AFA mechanism does not affect about 85% of households, thus removing a component that would otherwise incentivise ordinary Malaysians to go green.

The Energy Commission said in its maiden annual regulatory review in April that it was reassessing policies to ensure they remained aligned with future requirements amid a dynamic energy landscape.

Overall rooftop solar demand remains softer year on year in the second quarter despite sequential improvements, according to Verdant Solar Holdings Bhd (KL:VERDANT) CEO Zeth Lim. “It is a market share play with lower gross profit [in the industry now as it enters a policy transition-driven consolidation period],” he says.

Pekat’s Chin expects market softness to persist in much of 2026 as the market digests the new framework and installers recalibrate their sales approach. “A more meaningful recovery in volume is likely a 2027 story, supported by rising tariffs and greater consumer familiarity with ATAP mechanics,” he says.

Nevertheless, he cautions that sustained recovery in the residential segment may remain limited without further policy refinement, particularly if the ATAP framework does not evolve towards a more commercially sensible structure.

For now, larger players continue to benefit from earlier Large-Scale Solar (LSS) projects awarded, while expectations are building around a potential sixth bidding round.

Meanwhile, interest in RE exports to Singapore has cooled following fluctuating demand during the pilot phase of Energy Exchange Malaysia’s auction programme.

Government signals of potential gas market liberalisation by 2028 are reinforcing long-term optimism, meaning it could see market pricing for the fuel source that powers 40% of Peninsular Malaysia’s power plants instead of using discounted prices like today. Against this backdrop, Malaysia’s long-term solar industry roadmap remains intact, says Uzma.

“Beyond rebates, initiatives such as more supportive rules, implementation of carbon tax, quicker approvals, easier grid connection and support financing, rather than only subsidy, could further accelerate solar adoption,” it adds.

Rooftop solar remains out of reach for low-income group

Despite renewed interest in rooftop solar among homeowners, the demand is largely from high-consumption households, which are the biggest beneficiaries of electricity bill savings, according to solar players contacted by The Edge.

Lower-consumption households are not adopting rooftop solar at the same rate because of a less compelling financial reason and the technical challenges involved, even as the government pushes for higher solar adoption.

“The [residential property] segment with the highest return on investment (ROI) — large, high-consumption landed homes — is already partially penetrated. Expanding into the M40 and B40 markets requires solving financing and awareness issues, not just product-related ones,” says Pekat Group Bhd (KL:PEKAT) group managing director Chin Soo Mau.

Homeowners typically opt for solar when their electricity bills exceed a certain threshold, making the upfront capital — from about RM16,000 — justifiable. The payback period can be up to seven years of monthly bills of RM300 to RM350, according to The Edge’s estimates. It can take about four years if the monthly bills are RM900.

Zero-capital expenditure (capex) models, where providers fund the installation and homeowners pay reduced electricity bills, are available but industry players say these are generally viable only for households with monthly bills exceeding a few hundred ringgit.

“For residential users, particularly M40 and B40 households that typically install smaller systems, the financial case is less compelling. Payback periods of seven to eight years leave only a narrow window within the 10-year programme to realise meaningful savings, contributing to buyer hesitancy and slower adoption rates,” Chin explains.

“Zero-capex, own-use structures such as rent-to-own models and third-party PPAs (power purchase agreements) remain the most immediately scalable path for this segment,” he adds.

In short, the higher the electricity bill, the shorter the payback period, and vice versa. Does this mean low-consumption and lower-income households will be unable to adopt rooftop solar?

Last year, the government introduced a rooftop leasing programme called CREAM (Community Renewable Energy Aggregation Mechanism), which allows homeowners to rent out their rooftops to solar providers for income. These providers can then aggregate the generated energy and sell it to higher-consumption users for profit.

Meanwhile, the grid operator imposes a community access charge (CAC) to allow use of the distribution network.

Companies exploring CREAM include property developer Sime Darby Property Bhd (KL:SIMEPROP), which announced initiatives for new homes in April 2025, as well as TIME dotCom Bhd (KL:TIMECOM), through its renewable energy arm TIME Energy Sdn Bhd, in June last year.

Following industry feedback, the government reduced the CAC to 9 sen/kWh from 15 sen/kWh last August, with the aim of lowering the barrier to entry. However, there has been little progress since.

“The economics simply does not work for the majority of Malaysian homes, whether under CREAM or other rooftop solar schemes,” says TIME Energy CEO Arjun Arasu.

Some may argue that the owners of landed homes are typically not from the low- and middle-income groups. Also, lower-consumption users currently benefit from higher Energy Efficiency Incentives (EEI) in tariff calculations. Those who consume below 600kWh (around RM216 per month, or RM266 before EEI) are exempt from fuel cost surcharges or rebates under the Automatic Fuel Adjustment (AFA).

However, there are owners of low-cost landed homes and residents of flats or condominiums who could benefit if the rooftop leasing programme helps to lower electricity bills and increase their disposable income, as noted by the Ministry of Economy when the concept was proposed in 2023.

Additionally, many mature suburban areas cannot yet adopt rooftop solar due to limitations in distribution network capacity, which may take years to upgrade.

When asked during the Energy Commission’s briefing on its annual review in April about the need to upgrade its distribution network in mature housing areas to support CREAM, its CEO Siti Safinah Salleh said: “To a certain extent, this is true. However, if there is sufficient demand, the operator can approach us to request an upgrade, as it will benefit the system.”

To boost rooftop solar adoption among the M40 and B40 groups, Pekat’s Chin proposes reforms for strata properties.

“Condominium and apartment owners remain largely excluded due to the requirement of joint management body’s consent and grid connection complexities. A clear regulatory framework for strata solar, including virtual net metering across units within the same building, would unlock a significant untapped urban segment,” he says.

Verdant Solar Holdings Bhd (KL:VERDANT) managing director Zeth Lim suggests that CREAM should eliminate the CAC for 10 years, instead of charging nine sen/kWh with potential revisions after the fourth year. “This would enable lower-income homeowners to lease their rooftops.”

Lim proposes government-backed, low- or no-interest loans for B40 households to install rooftop solar and allowing repayments to be financed through energy savings — similar to Australia’s on-bill financing model.

If Malaysia is serious about solar, it needs a complete relook at the policies, says TIME Energy’s Arjun. “Current frameworks skew favourably towards the T20, and we need to focus on the rest of the country,” he adds.

 

Save by subscribing to us for your print and/or digital copy.

P/S: The Edge is also available on Apple's App Store and Android's Google Play.

      Print
      Text Size
      Share