This article first appeared in City & Country, The Edge Malaysia Weekly on March 23, 2026 - March 29, 2026
Last October, the government announced under Budget 2026 a special tax deduction equivalent to 10% of the qualifying renovation or conversion costs (capped at RM10 million) for developers repurposing commercial properties into residential use. Although such incentives may help, the viability of these projects remains a concern among developers.
City & Country dives into the complexities of undertaking such an exercise by speaking with property consultant Rahim & Co Chestertons Sdn Bhd director of research and consultancy services Sulaiman Saheh and property developers, as well as looking at think tank Research for Social Advancement’s (Refsa) research report.
According to Sulaiman, there are many idle or underperforming properties in Kuala Lumpur, especially in the older part of town. While many of these assets have been left in a lurch, some were given a new lease of life when their owners embarked on an adaptive reuse exercise.
The movement, although not a new phenomenon, has gained significant traction over the last few years. Sulaiman has observed this practice in older cities like the Klang Valley, George Town and Johor Bahru.
This momentum can be attributed to a city’s decline, as many idle or underperforming assets built decades ago require a refresh or rebranding. However, the case for converting the original use of the property can be attributed to the emptying of the city’s core. For example, downtown Kuala Lumpur has seen a decline in the inner city population as office workers, who once resided in the city, have moved out to the suburbs.
In a September 2025 report titled “The Case for Office to Residential Conversion in Kuala Lumpur”, Refsa says the boundaries of downtown Kuala Lumpur are along the Gombak River, from Jalan Sultan Ismail to Kampung Attap, including Stadium Merdeka, Masjid Jamek and Medan Tuanku towards the east.
On top of that, certain parts of the city lost their appeal when new areas opened up. For example, when the 100-acre Kuala Lumpur City Centre precinct opened up, multinational corporations (MNCs) started moving into the area, leaving downtown Kuala Lumpur hollow. This not only affected the number of people working in the city but also left office buildings empty as MNCs moved into higher-grade offices.
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) requirements are another factor that MNCs prioritise. This led to a number of buildings undergoing asset enhancement initiatives (AEIs) to ensure they are ESG-compliant to attract tenants and improve occupancy rates. Those who are complacent risk affecting occupancy rates with tenants choosing flight to quality.
It is undeniable that AEIs and adaptive reuse are useful strategies to improve the value of a property. The question is whether such exercises are easier said than done. What are the complexities involved for owners who wish to convert their asset into another use?
Sulaiman says there are four key factors to determine whether a property is ripe for conversion:
• The physical characteristics of the building, such as the age, structure, infrastructure, location and size;
• Zoning and legal constraints, which look at the density limits, plot ratios, strata titles and legal framework related to broader development policies;
• Understanding market demand by looking at population trends, income levels, lifestyle preferences and employment patterns;
• Financial viability of the project in terms of raising funds, expected returns, achievable sale or rental values, and the overall cost of undertaking the exercise.
Refsa suggests using a scorecard by global architecture firm Gensler to evaluate multiple factors when converting old office blocks.
There are five main criteria, namely floor plate, form, services, context and envelope. Other criteria that are also looked at are the height of the ceilings, number of lifts, access to transit and parking.
“Buildings with a good score would have shallow floor plates, high ceilings, side cores, zoning for residence, good transport accessibility and good light access,” says the report.
It also spotlights the discrepancy in value between commercial (office blocks in particular) and residential spaces. “The conversion would have to create enough value for developers and owners to agree on. The owner of an upscale office building may hold out for new commercial clients should the proposed conversion be seen as lowering the value of the building. Building owners may also take into account that residential tenants only pay for the space they rent, while offices usually rent out the entire floor.”
After considering these factors, there are two types of conversion to be considered: interim use and long-term use. Sulaiman says in some cases, building owners may convert to interim use before committing to a full conversion or major transformation.
“Interim use is often cyclical and driven by prevailing lifestyle trends. Many of such conversions tend to focus on sectors such as food and beverage (F&B), retail and lifestyle experiences, including pop-up stores and curated shopping concepts. These are often the most appealing and easiest to implement. As a result, adaptive reuse has become a viable way to unlock value,” he adds.
Sulaiman cites aged industrial spaces as examples. “Back then, the trend was [converting industrial spaces] into futsal courts. Today, the trend is lifestyle-oriented spaces and places designed to be visually appealing and Instagrammable,” he says.
REXKL is another example of interim use, which saw an old cinema transformed into a lifestyle venue featuring eateries, retail lots and event spaces. “Projects like these reflect a broader shift in consumer preferences, particularly among the younger urban population who increasingly appreciate experiential spaces that combine heritage, culture and modern lifestyle offerings,” says Sulaiman.
This trend is not limited to Kuala Lumpur. Projects in Penang like the Hin Bus Depot and Blue Mansion were transformed into cultural and hospitality spaces while a former battery factory in Johor Bahru was converted into an F&B and lifestyle destination.
Meanwhile, long-term use is seen as a strategy for developers or investors to generate sustainable returns while maximising the land’s potential value, says Sulaiman. He cites several examples of such conversion projects, including the former Lee Rubber Building into boutique hotel Else Kuala Lumpur; Wisma KFC into Hyatt Centric City Centre Kuala Lumpur; the former Oriental Bank building on Jalan Hang Lekiu, which is now the Moxy Kuala Lumpur Chinatown hotel; a former factory in Petaling Jaya into gourmet mall New Ocean World Fine Food City; and the former Wisma AIA in Kota Kinabalu into Stanton Hotel Kota Kinabalu.
Another developer undertaking this exercise is Land & General Bhd (KL:L&G), which reviewed its plans with The Edge in September last year to convert its office building in Putrajaya into serviced apartments at a cost of RM45 million, citing an oversupply of office space in the area.
He adds long-term use is also relevant to properties in heritage zones, where development intensity is restricted. “In many cases, the plot ratio may be capped at two or three, so owners cannot increase the building’s scale. Because the property is already designated as heritage, redevelopment options are limited. Hence, asset conversion comes into play.”
To better understand the process behind property conversion in Malaysia, we spoke to several property developers who have successfully delivered such projects.
According to Sulaiman, the conversion of offices into residential units may solve the country’s housing affordability issue.
“People are increasingly suggesting that instead of immediately focusing on home ownership, we should first explore renting. Although these schemes face challenges, the underlying idea is that one doesn’t need to buy a house immediately to have a decent home in a good location with adequate facilities,” he says.
“Renting allows people to live comfortably while saving money until they are ready to purchase. The focus remains on youth housing. The goal is to enable them to live close to work so that it reduces commuting time and traffic congestion.”
In fact, Refsa’s report highlights a former commercial building that has been retrofitted into Perumahan Bandar in Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman, a co-living space offering rental units to Malaysians aged between 18 and 35 by Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL).
Furthermore, co-living and shared facilities were previously trending in the market but interest has waned, says Sulaiman. “With office-to-residence conversions, there is likely to be renewed demand for co-living arrangements.
“Office buildings can be fully converted into independent apartments but this is costly. To reduce expenses, we need to optimise the facilities to match the target market. For instance, units don’t need full amenities. Each apartment can have a private bathroom and essential facilities, while communal areas are shared.”
He also suggests that government intervention could help cushion the financial burden of the developer by allowing idle buildings it owns to be converted into residential properties owing to lower asset valuations.
The conversion of offices into residential units comes with difficulties as well. According to Paramount Property Development Sdn Bhd CEO Chee Siew Pin, this process can be quite challenging.
“Number one, the car park is insufficient. Number two, the office has a large footprint, so when you try to carve out apartment units, they become longish and not very practical,” he points out.
ReU Living Sdn Bhd CEO Estee Tan concurs, saying that when converting offices, the middle section is always the problem.
“Office floor plates are very large. Also, unlike offices, residential units need windows for every room. These rooms are very difficult to sell because people feel uncomfortable staying in a space with no natural light,” she adds.
“To overcome that, for the middle rooms, we had to punch a hole through the building to create a lightwell. This way, the surrounding rooms would also get natural light.”
Meanwhile, ParkCity Group chief operating officer (East Malaysia and Cheras) Liew Swee Choong foresees a trend focusing on smaller projects as the conversion of large offices into residential projects often cannot be justified economically.
“For big buildings, it’s very difficult for developers to justify even though there are some tax breaks. The tax breaks will only have value if the developer can make money out of the projects,” he notes.
“Only when the residential value is somewhat on par with the commercial does it make sense. If the average residential value is still lower than the average commercial value, then I think it’s very difficult for the developer to do that.”
Sulaiman says the Malaysian property development sector is continuously evolving and that today’s younger generation, who grew up in a globalised and internet-connected era, appreciates both modern developments and heritage experiences.
“However, ageing properties face challenges in occupancy, rental returns and maintenance issues, which pressure owners to consider redevelopment or disposal. They must decide whether to continue holding an underperforming asset or repurpose it to maintain commercial viability,” he notes.
According to Rahim & Co’s Property Market Review 2025/2026, which was published this January, Kuala Lumpur recorded 30.51 million sq ft of vacant space, largely in older buildings, while Selangor recorded about 13.9 million sq ft of vacant space.
“With government incentives and the need to repurpose [these] vacant office spaces, these conversions are becoming mainstream. The ultimate goal is to create an inclusive city where all areas remain vibrant and avoid pockets of neglect.”
Save by subscribing to us for your print and/or digital copy.
P/S: The Edge is also available on Apple's App Store and Android's Google Play.