Thursday 17 Sep 2026
main news image

This article first appeared in Wealth, The Edge Malaysia Weekly on August 25, 2025 - August 31, 2025

The presence of tokenised assets in Malaysia remains insignificant despite their exponential growth globally. But all this could change rapidly in the next five years, especially when it comes to bonds and unit trusts.

Tokenised assets are real world assets represented by digital tokens on a blockchain. They can be stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities like gold or more.  

Investors with a crypto­currency (crypto) wallet in their smartphone might be able to trade not only digital assets but also traditional assets in tokenised form. The line between the “new” and the “old” is fast blurring.

An indication of this emerged during MyFintech Week, Malaysia’s flagship financial technology event, which was held in August. In his opening speech, Bank Negara Malaysia governor Datuk Seri Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour announced that the central bank will publish a discussion paper on asset tokenisation by the end of the year.

Sitting on stage with Abdul ­Rasheed during a panel session titled “Navigating the Fintech Frontier” was Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) chairman Datuk Mohammad Faiz Azmi.

Mohammad Faiz said the regulator wants the size of the digital asset market to grow to 8% of the equity market, without giving a specific timeline. Its current market size, five years after the first digital asset exchange (DAX) licence was issued, is roughly 1% of the equity market.

Mohammad Faiz also signalled that the regulator is adopting a more liberal approach for the DAXs to list digital tokens on their platforms for trading. “The other thing we are thinking about is, why be a nanny? Let’s put the onus on the players to figure out which [digital tokens] they want to offer clients. We are kind of shifting the regulatory perspective on that.”

During the same session, two other panellists — Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) managing director Chia Der Jiun and Hong Kong Monetary Authority chief executive Eddie Yue — elaborated on the policies and intentions of each jurisdiction with regard to stablecoins, another form of blockchain-based tokens with values pegged to specific currencies.

A day later, Kenanga Investment Bank Bhd released its white paper titled “Project Juara: Malaysia’s Asset Tokenisation Opportunity”, jointly authored by Saison Capital Pte Ltd, Helicap Labs Pte Ltd (Helix) and Satori Research Ltd.

Saison Capital is the venture-­capital arm of Japan-based Credit Saison, which invests in early-stage companies; Helix is a blockchain-­based tokenisation start-up founded in 2023, while Satori Research is a liquidity provider, market maker and algorithmic trader for digital assets.

Just how big could tokenised assets grow in the next five years? Kenanga and its co-authors tag it at US$43 billion.

According to Project Juara’s estimation, bonds and sukuk are the front runners in tokenisation. Tokenised corporate bonds could garner a market size of US$13.5 billion by 2030 while government bonds could hit US$10.9 billion. This is followed by Islamic financial products, mainly sukuk (US$9 billion) and unit trust funds (US$6 billion).

In total, bonds are expected to take up US$33.4 billion, or 78% of the estimated total tokenised asset market size in Malaysia by 2030, according to the report.

Saison Capital partner Qin En Looi says the figure is a conservative estimate based on international growth trends for each asset class. The actual growth could be a lot higher.

“Back in 2020, tokenised asset [market size] was only at US$50 million. As at Aug 7 this year, the figure was at US$25 billion (RM106 billion). This figure excludes stablecoins and consists mainly of US Treasuries (UST) and [corporate] bonds. The market has grown by about 500 times globally in the past five years. We benchmark the growth in Malaysia against this and made an estimation on each asset class,” he says.

Gaining traction

Globally, widely tokenised assets are the UST, money market instruments, private credit and specific commodities, such as gold, says Helix co-founder and CEO Jitendra Singh Jaitawat.

“The first breed [of asset class] that always gets tokenised is fixed income instrument. It is a natural fit due to its yield generating characteristic [where yields can be automatically distributed to token holders via smart contracts],” he explains.

On the local front, the SC introduced its regulatory sandbox in October last year to encourage securities tokenisation and spur innovations in the capital market. It also announced a collaboration with Khazanah Nasional Bhd to explore the issuance of tokenised bonds.

Several industry players say they expect Khazanah’s tokenised bonds to be the first tokenised product in the market, partly due to the status, size and capability of the sovereign wealth fund. They believe that the Khazanah project will take time as its success is vital and Khazanah will have to decide on fundamental issues, such as which blockchain it wants to use to issue its tokens.

However, Hann Liew, co-­founder and CEO of digital asset fund management firm Halogen Capital, says traditional assets — be they bonds or equities — can be easily tokenised through a unit trust fund structure. It is the lowest hanging fruit for asset tokenisation.

Why? Liew says assets, whether bonds, equities, real estate or gold, are already fractionalised into smaller units within a fund. For instance, a bond fund breaks down bond issuances, typically worth several million ringgit per lot in the primary market, into much smaller units for retail investors to access. A real estate investment trust (REIT) does the same to real estate. The key difference lies in the underlying blockchain technology.

“We’re piloting the project. The tokenised version of our fixed income fund has already been running for six months internally. All the tokens now are sitting in the wallet controlled by our trustee without being distributed to the users.” - Liew, Halogen Capital

A unit trust fund is also known as a collective investment scheme that allows investors with similar objectives to pool their money to be invested in a portfolio of securities, including bonds and equities.

These securities are usually bought in large aggregated transactions with the fund house’s master or omnibus trading account, instead of each investor’s individual account. The securities are then fractionalised and assigned to each unitholder, while the calculation and recording of the “units” are done internally by the fund managers and trustees.

Liew says the fractionalising of “units” does not involve the transfer of actual shares or bonds from one central depository system (CDS) account or authorised depository institution (ADI) account to another, which involves interacting with the existing systems of Bursa Malaysia and Bank Negara, which is why tokenisation can be done more easily within a unit trust fund structure.

“The next step is merely to adopt blockchain technology, so you don’t just rely on the trustee to do the calculations for the units. You rely on [computer] codes. Rather than using the word ‘units’, you use ‘tokens’. It is the lowest hanging fruit in my opinion,” he explains.

Liew’s words are backed by action. He says Halogen Capital has tokenised its Halogen Shariah Ringgit Income Fund, a fixed income fund. The process started as early as 2023 when the company received funding from the SC’s Digital Innovation Fund (Digid), which was set up to co-fund innovative projects to allow new and competitive propositions in the Malaysian capital market.

“We’re piloting the project. The tokenised version of our fixed income fund has already been running for six months internally. All the tokens now are sitting in the wallet controlled by our trustee without being distributed to the users,” Liew says, adding that those tokens are ready to be deployed and traded once the regulations permit.

“We are exploring tokenising our money market funds through some live case studies. It is a process that is still in its early stages.” - De Alwis, Kenanga Investors

It is not just the emerging and boutique fund houses that are looking into tokenising unit trust funds. Kenanga Investors Bhd, a long-established and reputable fund house, is actively looking at tokenising its money market fund, says Datuk Ismitz Matthew De ­Alwis, its CEO and executive director.

“We are exploring tokenising our money market funds through some live case studies. It is a process that is still in its early stages. As we go along, we are in consultation with the regulators about the regulations surrounding tokenised assets, before we make our next decision,” he says.

While they may not garner much attention, digital tokens are already in use locally for fundraising purposes. BidNow, a Malaysian auction platform, raised RM10 million from 469 investors last year through the pitchIN Token Crowdfunding (TCF) platform.

The second project raising funds on the TCF platform is Frac, a company that specialises in helping enterprises tokenise real-world assets, according to the pitchIN official website. As at Aug 12, it had raised RM1.54 million from 13 investors, exceeding its minimum fundraising target of RM1.5 million.

PitchIN and Kapital DX Sdn Bhd (KLDX) are currently the only two initial exchange offering (IEO) platforms licensed by the SC, allowing them to facilitate fundraising activities for start-ups and companies by issuing digital tokens.

KLDX’s official website shows it has conducted seven primary listings, with the sole issuer being Integra Healthcare, a healthcare solutions provider. The most recent listing was the Integra Health-T9, a fixed-income instrument with a minimum funding amount of RM1 million and a profit rate of 8%.

Stablecoin as hot as AI

Elsewhere, the adoption of asset tokenisation is growing, especially for stablecoins, according to C K Ong, chief operating officer of SBI Digital Markets, a Singapore-based digital solution provider regulated by MAS that is actively involved in asset tokenisation services.

Stablecoin, or tokenised cash — mostly backed by fiat currency or government debt paper — is taking the world by storm as Hong Kong passed its Stablecoin Bill in May, followed by the US passing its Genius Act in July that set up a regulatory regime for stablecoins.

“There is a lot of interest in stablecoins. It’s almost as hot as AI ­(artificial intelligence) now,” Ong says. SBI Digital Markets is a subsidiary of SBI Digital Asset Holdings, the digital asset arm of Japanese financial conglomerate SBI Group.

The latest trend surrounding stablecoin is how issuers can distribute yields to token holders.

Depending on the regulations of a specific jurisdiction, stablecoin issuers may back their digital tokens with fiat currency or government debt papers that pay interest periodically. The interest can be distributed to stablecoin token holders.

“However, if interest is distributed directly to the token holders, the regulators might look at them as securities and subject them to different sets of regulations,” he says.

So, industry players are coming up with solutions, such as enrolling clients under a “different programme” that entitles them to monetary returns.

“A lot of people say this year is the year of tokenisation. But I don’t see the industry showing a lot of transactions and trading volumes. I think it’s just the start, rather than ‘the year’.” - Ong, SBI Digital Markets

Over the years, Ong has realised that the demand and risk appetite for tokenised assets can vary widely, which led SBI Digital Markets to tokenise niche assets for specific groups of clients, like intellectual property.

“I’m trying to structure more specialised products that are harder for the bigger institutions like banks or asset managers to do. These are the more ‘exotic’ alternative products.”

At the moment, Ong says stablecoin remains less explored by banks for obvious reasons, including cybersecurity and legal risk.

In Malaysia, Blox Blockchain Sdn Bhd (Blox) is the only stablecoin issuer that has announced its product to the public while engaging with regulators.

Blox’s MYRC, the ringgit stablecoin backed by the fiat currency at a one-to-one ratio, had 644 users that went through its know-your-­customer process as at July 18. They transacted a total of RM53.18 million MYRC, with a total of RM1.16 million MYRC circulating in the market during the corresponding period.

Blox isn’t a regulated entity and the MYRC is not legal tender, but the company has been engaging with regulators and is a participant of the PayNet Fintech Hub, Malaysia’s first fintech-focused community and accelerator programme.

Blox co-founder and chief financial officer Ashwin Chockalingam says the firm continues to engage with Bank Negara for updates regarding the Digital Asset Innovation Hub launched in June. The hub aims to provide a controlled environment for fintech companies and innovators to test new products and services, such as programmable payments and ringgit-backed stablecoins, according to news reports.

While industry players agree that asset tokenisation is a major trend globally, SBI Digital Markets’ Ong says it’s still early days — the reason being transaction volumes in many of these tokenised assets remain thin.

“A lot of people say this year is the year of tokenisation. But I don’t see the industry showing a lot of transactions and trading volumes. I think it’s just the start, rather than ‘the year’. I think it’ll take another three to five years for adoption to pick up significantly,” he opines.

 

Benefits of tokenisation yet to be realised

Tokenised assets can bring various benefits to investors, but are unlikely to materialise soon as the country is still in the early stages of the journey, according to industry players.

Underpinning tokenisation is blockchain technology, which can increase the operational efficiency of financial services firms. Take unit trust funds, for example.

An industry player who did not want to be named says after securities like bonds and shares are bought in large aggregated transactions with investors’ money, the values of those securities are broken down into “units” and assigned to each investor.

The process involves not just the fund manager and trustee, but also what is known as a securities services company — for accounting exercises — and transfer agent, for maintaining the register of unitholders, showing how many units of a fund each investor holds.

The industry player says the work of the securities services company and transfer agent can be automated with a smart contract feature enabled by the blockchain technology, and the cost saving can be passed on to investors of the unit trust fund.

In fact, such a trend is already happening globally. C K Ong, chief operating officer of SBI Digital Markets, says some of his clients lowered the overall fees of their unit trust funds and bonds by five to 10 basis points by “putting some transfer agent functions on-chain (on the blockchain)”.

Other key benefits are market access and liquidity. When a unit trust fund or individual bond paper is tokenised into a much smaller size — say, RM10 per token — they can be traded by more people. If these digital tokens are allowed to be listed on digital asset exchanges (DAXs), they can also be easily traded by a larger pool of investors.

Liquidity of these securities and investment instruments could improve, too, when more investors are able to access them. But Ong says transaction volumes of tokenised assets globally have yet to pick up meaningfully this year.

Industry players also point out that cost saving from asset tokenisation isn’t expected to happen soon in Malaysia as the regulator is leaning towards the “digital twin” model as a start.

Put simply, a digital twin model means tokenised asset providers create a digital record on the blockchain, which is cryptographically secured, on top of the off-chain (off the blockchain) record. Both on-chain and off-chain records have to be consistent.

Adopting a digital twin model means that even if a tokenised asset provider can automate certain record-keeping processes with blockchain, they are still required to maintain various records in the way they have been done traditionally and in compliance with the existing rules and law.

Cost saving will happen when the regulations allow the “native token” model where information is allowed to be recorded on the blockchain or distributed ledger without an off-chain equivalent, but it will take time.

According to a public consultation paper by the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) titled “Proposed regulatory framework for offering and dealing in tokenised capital market products”, the regulator “has adopted a phased approach in facilitating the offering and dealing in tokenised capital market products”.

It mentions that “given the increased complexity and risk associated with native tokens, further time and consideration are needed to develop an appropriate regulatory framework for native tokens”.

Suhanna Husein, co-founder and CEO of CoKeeps, the first digital asset custodian licensed by the SC, says it is pertinent for the country to gradually move towards adopting native tokens.

“The digital twin model has been the preferred first step in many jurisdictions because it fits within existing legislation and processes, and matches the technology risk appetite of the stakeholders.

“That said, there should be clear objectives and milestones for asset tokenisation, with the ultimate aim of moving towards native tokens. Only then can we unlock the full benefits of [asset tokenisation as] highlighted in various studies,” she says.

Save by subscribing to us for your print and/or digital copy.

P/S: The Edge is also available on Apple's App Store and Android's Google Play.

      Print
      Text Size
      Share