This article first appeared in The Edge Malaysia Weekly on February 3, 2025 - February 9, 2025
EVERY year, in late October, the federal government’s budget and fiscal position come under the spotlight when the finance minister tables the annual spending for the following year in parliament.
Factors such as the federal government’s budget deficit, total revenue growth from tax and non-tax sources, and public debt levels are scrutinised for the trajectory of the country’s fiscal and economic situations.
But the government is not just in Putrajaya; it is also made up of the governments of the 13 states.
What are the fiscal situations of the state governments, and which is running the biggest fiscal deficit? What is the state of their public funds and debt positions?
Based on the Auditor General’s (AG) Report 2024 on the state governments, Penang’s financial situation stands out.
The small state with an outsized contribution to Malaysia’s gross domestic product (GDP) and trade has rather low revenues and big fiscal deficits. It has been running on a deficit for more than 13 years.
In fact, in 2023, it had the biggest fiscal deficit among the 13 states, at RM421.7 million. Its operating expenditure (OpEx) alone was RM711.8 million, or 120% of its revenues of RM593 million during the year (see infographic on Page 54).
Penang had projected a deficit of RM514.53 million in 2024.
For its 2025 budget, the state government under chief minister Chow Kon Yeow targets a much smaller deficit of RM33.6 million — the lowest in its history — with revenues projected to increase to RM906.5 million, 70% higher than 2024’s target of RM533.08 million.
While the state has taken the necessary steps to reduce its budget deficit — in part by having a lower development expenditure (DevEx) of RM220 million, compared with RM302.93 million in 2023 and RM374.72 million in 2024 — its consolidated funds balance has dwindled as the state has been drawing down on it to supplement its budget every year.
The consolidated funds are projected to decline to a mere RM50 million as at Jan 1, 2025, according to Chow, when tabling the state’s 2025 budget last November. Data from the AG’s Report 2024 shows Penang’s consolidated funds were RM2.1 billion in 2019 and RM2.12 billion in 2022.
“A government budget is not [like] a private company’s budget, for the simple reason that a government’s duty is different from a private company’s,” says Zairil Khir Johari, the assemblyman for Tanjung Bungah, as well as state executive councillor for infrastructure and transport.
Zairil says Penang has been running on a deficit as the state has “no income” or, rather, a small revenue base that is dependent on assessment rates and land tax. In addition, he says the state has not revised the assessment rates and land tax for quite a while.
The fact that Penang does not have mineral or timber resources also gives it a lower revenue base compared with many of the other states.
According to its financial statement for 2023, the biggest contributor to revenues was non-tax income, which amounted to RM325.28 million, or 55% of the total.
Tax revenues stood at RM150.16 million, or 25% of the total in 2023, while the rest (RM117.52 million) came from non-revenue receipts.
The state’s non-tax revenues declined RM11.04 million, or 3.29%, from 2022. Such revenue comprises payments for licences, registration and permits, services rendered, receipts from the sale of goods, rents, profits from investments and financing, as well as fines and penalties.
The largest contributor to Penang’s tax revenues was quit rent, which amounted to RM137.03 million in 2023. This was, however, lower than the RM142.83 million collected in 2022.
In general, state governments’ revenues are largely land-related, such as the sale of land, land premiums charged on conversion of land status, mineral wealth and entertainment duty (see “The laws that govern how a state derives its revenue” on Page 52).
Therefore, it is not a surprise that revenues for Penang, the second smallest state after Perlis, are smaller than the other states’.
However, its contribution to the country’s GDP in 2023 stood at 7.4%, or RM116 billion, higher than that of larger states such as Sabah, Perak and Pahang.
“It is 100% ironic,” says Zairil. “Unfortunately, our federalism is structured that way. There is no institutionalised tax redistribution formula,” he adds.
He claims that Penang contributes RM8 billion a year in income taxes to the federal kitty. In 2023, its non-revenue income stood at RM117.52 million, which was RM7.11 million or 6.44% higher compared with RM110.41 million in 2022.
Out of the RM117.52 million of non-revenue income, Penang received RM100.78 million from government agencies. These receipts made up around 17% of Penang’s revenues of RM593 million in 2023.
At the other end of the spectrum, Sarawak is the richest state in the country. The state government projects that its revenues will reach RM14.2 billion this year, compared with the revised estimate of RM13.91 billion in 2024.
In 2023, its actual revenues were RM13.3 billion, almost equivalent to that collected by the next four states combined — Sabah (RM7.6 billion), Selangor (RM2.71 billion), Johor (RM1.94 billion) and Pahang (RM1.31 billion).
The giant state’s revenues have grown tremendously over the last seven years. It collected RM7.2 billion in 2018, RM7.27 billion in 2019 and a much higher RM10.65 billion in 2020.
In 2021, revenues declined to RM7.62 billion, before recovering to RM11.91 billion in 2022, due to the positive movement in crude oil and natural gas prices. In 2024, according to Sarawak’s estimates of revenue and expenditure report, it should have earned a total of RM12.75 billion, which is slightly lower than in 2023.
Note that in December 2020, the state government and Petronas announced the conclusion of negotiations on a commercial settlement for the imposition of state sales tax on petroleum products.
In 2019, the state government took Petronas to court to compel the national oil company to pay over RM1.3 billion in state sales tax for the period up to June 30, 2019.
According to the AG’s Report on Sarawak’s finances for 2021, the state collected RM4.82 billion in tax revenues from oil and natural gas in 2020, as the outstanding taxes in 2019 of RM3 billion were received in 2020.
Sarawak collected RM3.45 billion in 2021 and RM4.37 billion in 2022 in taxes on oil and natural gas, as prices for the commodities continued to increase during the two-year period.
The imposition of sales tax on crude oil and natural gas has become the largest contributor to the state’s revenues, making up 36.7% of the total in 2022. Its tax revenues, however, fell to RM6.26 billion in 2023, from RM6.7 billion in 2022.
The huge increase in revenues helped Sarawak register a surplus of RM1.45 billion in 2022, without jeopardising its services to the people of the state. The state’s OpEx rose to as much as RM5.94 billion in 2021, from RM2.64 billion in 2018, before falling to RM4.2 billion in 2022.
However, Sarawak spent less on DevEx, even as its revenues grew throughout the five-year period to 2022. In 2022, the state spent RM6.26 billion for development purposes, down from RM8.33 billion in 2018.
Nevertheless, this situation is changing, as Sarawak started spending more on DevEx starting in 2023.
According to its revenue and expenditure estimates, in 2023, the state transferred RM6.8 billion to its statutory funds — essentially its DevEx. OpEx was RM4.48 billion, slightly higher than in 2022.
The state recorded a surplus of RM1.94 billion during the year.
Last year, Sarawak spent RM7.8 billion on DevEx and RM4.77 billion on OpEx, and registered a smaller surplus of RM1.23 billion. For 2025, the state estimates that its surplus is going to be even smaller, at RM485.7 million, as it plans to spend RM13.7 billion while collecting RM14.2 billion in revenues.
The huge revenues allowed Sarawak to accumulate RM26.9 billion in consolidated funds as at 2023. Meanwhile, it also had RM2.23 billion in claimable loans, as well as RM10.06 billion worth of investments.
On the other hand, its public debts stood at RM1.86 billion as at 2023.
Its revenues are expected to continue to surge in the years ahead, as its oil and gas company Petroleum Sarawak Bhd (Petros) resumes the role of sole gas aggregator in the state. Sarawak is Malaysia’s largest producer of natural gas.
The implications of Petros assuming this role will be significant for Sarawak’s revenues, as it is believed that Petronas made an annual profit of between RM10 billion and RM15 billion from gas exports from Sarawak.
Will Malaysia’s economic centre shift towards East Malaysia in the years to come, as Sarawak uses its wealth to build the state’s economy?
Even before Sarawak began asserting its rights on the sharing of its wealth from natural resources with the federal government, Kelantan had been fighting for its fair share of the petroleum pie since the 1990s.
As Kelantan was the only state governed by a party different from the one at the federal level between 1990 and 2008, its leadership had long pressed for royalty payments for petroleum produced in waters off its shores.
However, its demands were rejected by the federal government. Under the Continental Shelf Act 1966, the “territorial waters” of a state are defined as seawaters adjacent to the coast not exceeding three nautical miles measured from the low water mark.
The argument is that petroleum produced in waters off Kelantan’s coast is not the state’s to begin with, as it is produced from wells beyond its territorial waters. This has led to the state being deprived of any royalties from petroleum produced off its coast.
Nevertheless, the federal government has been paying compassionate funds to Kelantan, and this has been a major source of income for the state.
In 2023, the state government recorded total revenues of RM824.7 million, 16% lower than the previous year’s RM983.4 million. This was, however, higher than in 2020 and 2021, when it recorded RM747 million and RM773.5 million respectively.
Kelantan’s lower revenues in 2023 were due to the smaller amount of compassionate funds from the federal government, compared with 2022. In 2023, it received RM217.96 million in compassionate funds, compared with RM331.38 million in 2022.
The compassionate funds are a major source of income for Kelantan, as they made up about 26% of the state’s revenues in 2023 and 33.7% in 2022.
Compassionate funds are one source of non-revenue income for the state, and Kelantan is very much dependent on it to run its services.
Non-revenue income has been the biggest source of income for the state since 2019. In 2023, non-revenue receipts made up 49.4% of the state’s income, ahead of tax revenue and non-tax revenue.
Meanwhile, the state has been running on a deficit since 2020. In 2023, the deficit stood at RM263.2 million, the highest in the five-year period since 2019. This is because the state has been spending much more on OpEx each year.
OpEx increased from RM579.5 million in 2019 to RM862.4 million in 2023. The only year OpEx was lower than in the preceding year was 2021, when the state spent RM681.9 million.
The east coast state has also spent an increasing amount on DevEx, from RM137.4 million in 2019 to RM225.6 million in 2023. Again, 2021 was the only year when the state spent less than in the preceding year.
The state government is facing some financial difficulties. Its consolidated funds declined by a significant RM245.4 million, or 43%, to RM325.46 million in 2023, from RM570.86 million in 2022.
The negative balance of its development funds also expanded by RM141.67 million, or 12.7%, in 2023 to RM1.26 billion, from a deficit of RM1.11 billion in 2022.
Despite this, the state government has managed to pare its public debts year after year. In 2023, the balance of its public debts stood at RM650.94 million, compared with RM815.14 million in 2019.
Nevertheless, its outstanding debt payments to the federal government rose by RM16.24 million, or 6.5%, in 2023 to RM267.47 million, from RM251.23 million in 2022. The state paid only RM10.48 million, or 3.8% of the RM278.03 million that it had to pay, to the federal government in 2023.
For its Budget 2025, RM1.45 billion was allocated for the operation and development of the state. The state projects it will collect RM997.26 million in revenues this year.
Looking at the states’ revenues compared with their GDP, it is clear that the more developed states are not necessarily earning more than their less developed counterparts.
With a GDP of RM406.1 billion in 2023, Selangor’s revenues of RM2.71 billion during the year translate into a mere 0.67% of its GDP, which is the largest among all the states. As a comparison, the federal government’s revenues as a percentage of Malaysia’s GDP stood at 16.2%.
Of course, most of the government functions such as land public transport, healthcare, education, internal security and defence are under the federal list of the constitution, and states have less responsibility than the federal government.
However, state governments do have some major responsibilities, such as developing and maintaining water infrastructure, as well as state roads and drainage and irrigation systems.
Most states are unable to develop and maintain their own water infrastructure, and have had to rely on borrowings and funding from the federal agency Pengurusan Aset Air Bhd. Most states’ debts are due to borrowings from the federal government for water infrastructure purposes.
For example, of Kedah’s RM1.93 billion public debt in 2023, RM1.23 billion is debt for water supply purposes. For Penang, RM27.8 million, or 75.7% of its public debt in 2023, was the result of water supply purposes.
Selangor’s 0.67% revenue-to-GDP ratio is smaller than Kedah’s and Kelantan’s 1.21% and 3% respectively in 2023. However, it is higher than Penang’s 0.5% that year, when the state produced RM116 billion in goods and services.
This raises the question of whether state governments should be allowed to collect more revenues from their own people, rather than just depending on revenues that are tied to land matters and property assessments.
As can be seen with the case of Sarawak, whose revenues shot up in 2020 when it received the green light to collect sales tax on petroleum products, the other states should perhaps be allowed to collect some form of indirect tax that better reflects their economic wealth.
However, the capability of the states to collect indirect taxes, as well as what they will do with the additional funds, would also be in question.
Read also:
Save by subscribing to us for your print and/or digital copy.
P/S: The Edge is also available on Apple's App Store and Android's Google Play.