1. Does the MCMC support a move from a single wholesale network (SWN) model to a DWN model as proposed by the MNOs? If the answer to this question is "yes", what has changed since the MCMC’s statement on March 2, 2021 entitled “MCMC’s Oversight of Digital Nasional Berhad — the Government of Malaysia’s Special Purpose Vehicle for 5G” where the MCMC stated that “by removing the need for existing telecommunications companies to invest in 5G networks, their efforts and resources can continue to be focused on improving and expanding 4G services and fibre networks under JENDELA so crucial for the success of 5G deployment. This at the same time will ensure that the digital gap can be minimised”. (bold and italics are mine).
2. DNB has explained its structure and operating model publicly and openly, and conducted many stakeholder briefings, including to MPs. Will the details of the DWN model that is being proposed by the MNOs be also published for stakeholders, including MPs, to view and provide feedback to? From a transparency perspective, is it not important for the telco industry to comply with the same standards as DNB, all of which are regulated by the MCMC? 
3. One of the most important questions to do with the DWN model is whether the MNOs will be allowed to focus on the more profitable urban areas and follow a “demand-led” model of 5G deployment. Does the MCMC agree with a DWN model where the MNO-led consortium will be allowed to focus largely on the more profitable urban areas following a “demand-led” model of 5G deployment and leave DNB to focus on the less profitable semi-urban and rural areas following a “supply-led” model? (In other words, let the private sector reap the profits of 5G deployment and leave the government to pay for the costs of the 5G roll-out in the non-profitable, largely rural areas.)
4. If the DWN model mentioned in 3 is what the MNOs are proposing, what implications would this have for the financial sustainability of DNB? If, for example, the MNOs are allowed to focus only on the more profitable urban areas, does this mean that DNB will not receive any or very little revenue from the MNOs for access to DNB’s 5G network in the rural areas? If this is the case, what is the likelihood that DNB will have to “close shop”, leaving only the MNO-led consortium remaining in the 5G deployment space, thereby turning the DWN into a SWN model but one that is completely owned and controlled by the private sector?
5. What are the financial implications for the government of Malaysia if we move from a SWN model to a DWN model? How much would the government have to spend to cover the 5G deployment costs for DNB, which cannot be recouped back from charges to the MNOs (because of lower demand in the rural areas)? Would DNB be able to borrow money from the open market and institutional investors in a DWN business model environment? How much more in terms of interest service charges would DNB have to pay in a DWN versus SWN business model environment? What are the possible legal liabilities which DNB would have to face from its suppliers, contractors and vendors, including Ericsson?
6. If there is a decision by the Cabinet that Malaysia should change from a SWN to a DWN model that is similar to what has been proposed by the MNOs, how much would this change delay the deployment of 5G in the country? Keep in mind that the Malaysia is already lagging behind our neighbours in terms of 5G deployment and this has resulted in Malaysia losing our competitive edge in terms of mobile download speeds, according to a recent industry report.

Appendix 1: Letter by Celcom, Digi, Maxis and U Mobile to the list of 10 questions from Dr Ong Kian Ming to the MNOs on Feb 14, 2022: