This article first appeared in Digital Edge, The Edge Malaysia Weekly on November 29, 2021 - December 5, 2021
The prospects for agricultural technology (agritech) are bright, especially with 5G connectivity promising to revolutionise the future of crops as we know it with ultrafast speeds and near-real-time response on the horizon.
The benefits of these solutions significantly outweigh the cons, considering the fact that the use of artificial intelligence (AI), drones and Internet of Things (IoT) devices and sensors could tremendously improve crop efficiency and sustainability.
Recognising that the agriculture sector lacks high-technology adoption, the government, through the 12th Malaysia Plan (12MP), is pushing the adoption of smart technologies to elevate the sector, from improving the output of industrial crops to providing equitable and sustainable growth for smallholder farmers.
The five-year plan, effective until 2025, entails strategies to build a smart farming framework, which will complement the impending launch of the National Agrofood Policy 2021-2030 and the National Agricommodity Policy 2021-2030.
But, while the government and larger industry players are heavily backing technology as a solution to the woes faced by smallholder farmers, structural issues that have long plagued the agriculture sector remain and cannot be ignored.
Realistically speaking, it makes little economic sense to incorporate agritech solutions in small farms, primarily because it costs too much, say industry experts.
Smallholders, who are largely responsible for food crops, lag behind large-scale farming and agribusinesses in terms of productivity and efficiency as they grapple with issues such as lack of access to technology, innovation, financial support, infrastructure and opportunities, says Dr Sarena Che Omar, deputy director of research at Khazanah Research Institute.
“The Malaysian agriculture industry can be split into two: food and commodities [palm oil and natural rubber]. For food, the producers are mainly smallholders. For example, in paddy farming nationwide, about 200,000 paddy farmers are working on an average land size of 2ha to 3½ha, which is small,” says Sarena.
“When it is small, coupled with cash-tight, poor farmers, it is very difficult to entice them to risk their production to experiment with new technology. What if it doesn’t work or, like in most cases, it requires further fine-tuning or adaptations [that could take several attempts before the technology] is deemed effective?”
This group, many of whom are still classified as being in the B40 (bottom 40% income group), also remains disconnected from the market and is exposed to excessive exploitation by middlemen in the distribution channels.
It is not that Malaysia’s agriculture sector is impoverished. Financial resources have been ploughed into industrial crops, with the country’s most prized commodity being palm oil. The agriculture sector contributed 7.4%, or RM99.5 billion, to Malaysia’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 2020, of which crude palm oil was a major contributor at 45.5%.
The same cannot be said, however, for food crops.
Even though the agrofoods subsector grew 3% a year — owing mainly to an increase in the production of livestock, vegetables and fruits — contributing 53.3% to the agriculture sector in 2020 compared with 46.8% in 2015, the subsector’s share of total agriculture remains below the 60% self-sufficiency target.
This is after having dedicated RM76 million worth of matching grants for automation and mechanisation through agricultural departments and agencies. The 12MP report stated that three pilot smart farming projects under the eLadang programme were undertaken to provide farmers with opportunities to adopt digital solutions along the complete supply chain.
“These pilot projects resulted in an increased yield of about 12% and reduced manpower by 50%. In the area of R&D, a total of 57 agricultural technologies worth RM16.7 million were developed and commercialised,” it adds.
The 12MP attributes the shortfall in the self-sufficiency target to “the lack of high-technology adoption in agriculture despite the implementation of various strategies to increase agrofood production”.
It is exacerbated by the lack of effort to encourage smart farming, dependency on low- and semiskilled labour, ageing farmers and lack of private sector investments.
“In addition, farmers are also confronted with several issues in adopting smart farming, including the lack of technical knowledge, fragmentation of information, higher deployment cost and poor network connectivity to support smart technologies,” states the 12MP.
It is also because the agriculture sector — one of the world’s oldest industries — has been slower to innovate, says Amiruddin Abdul Shukor, acting CEO of the Malaysian Global Innovation & Creativity Centre (MaGIC).
“There are plenty of opportunities to modernise, and possibly leapfrog the technology curve. According to McKinsey & Co, agriculture looks poised for a digital transformation that could yield US$500 billion (RM2.1 trillion) in global GDP by 2030.
“However, farming remains the least digitised industry in the world, despite the global population, which will need feeding and is expected to grow to 9.7 billion by 2050,” he says.
To modernise, however, the sector desperately needs a focused and targeted resource allocation, says Dr Jay Desan, co-founder of BoomGrow Productions Sdn Bhd, Malaysia’s first 5G-connected indoor vertical farm.
“The use of tech in farming will be totally transformative in the next few years simply because some of the required technology and hardware integration has become more plug and play, more affordable and more accessible to even farmers in very rural areas.
“The use of tech will also become more seamless in tracking, monitoring and supporting production, including enabling better germination rates, yield consistency and reduction in labour,” she says.
But the real problem is that there is no point in integrating technology into a broken agricultural ecosystem, says Jay. “A lot of current efforts seem to focus on adding more tech-based bling, including IoT and sensors, without deeper questions on the why.”
For years, the entire biodiversity has been compromised and therefore a systems-based approach is needed to address all deep-rooted problems, says Jay. “Waterways are clogging from agricultural runoffs, [large-scale] land clearing continues and we have massive supply chain miles to transport crops.
“We are also seeing the effects of soil depletion. Fertile land is becoming severely degraded, owing to a combination of intensive farming practices. We can’t just think of tech; we need to think of land regeneration, farmer education and the impact of pesticides on our health to understand how broken the agriculture sector is today.
“The traditional farmer is daily battling the impact of climate change in a way that none of us are. A slight impact of weather conditions has massive implications.
“[Therefore,] a systems-based approach is fundamental to relooking at impacts. Only after that come the education and capacity-building for farmers and everyone else,” she says.
Meanwhile, the 12MP suggests that unsustainable financing mechanisms for replanting have affected the capability of smallholders, resulting in low yields. Ineffective farm management and land fragmentation limit the optimisation of land use and adoption of modern agriculture technology.
“That is why it is easier to adopt technologies when it involves larger farm sizes. Of course, this doesn’t mean smaller farms cannot innovate. With the right type of ecosystem, it can happen. Some ways to do this include encouraging contract-based farming between multinational corporations (MNCs) and small farmers, where MNCs provide farm extension training and, in return, they purchase farm goods at a fixed price,” proposes Sarena.
“Another way to do this is to encourage the entry of social enterprises and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) into collaborations with the farmers. Social enterprises could work with paddy farmers outside granary areas to improve their farming practices, thereby helping them increase their yield and income,” she says.
Impact-driven enterprise Langit Collective, for example, does this by bringing rural and heirloom agricultural produce by smallholder farmers from Sabah and Sarawak to larger markets, notes Sarena.
The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation’s National Technology & Innovation Sandbox (NTIS) is one of the government setups seeking to address some of these issues, primarily through the application of advanced technology. But its agritech resources are mostly focused on palm oil production.
“The NTIS has put to flight innovations that will modernise Malaysia’s agricultural sector with advanced intelligence systems and advanced materials — all towards improving crop yield and farm production. In addition, the NTIS will look to skill up the labour force and position them for increased income potential,” says Amiruddin. MaGIC is the NTIS’ secretariat.
The NTIS is working with several ecosystem partners such as the Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA) to accelerate the adoption of technology in their operations. For example, the NTIS and some FELDA settlements are working together to test out precision spraying, AI-robotics automated farms and battery-powered harvesting machines for palm oil.
With such technology, Amiruddin says, the NTIS not only hopes to increase income by improving yield and reducing operational costs but also to establish high-skilled jobs for a new generation of FELDA settlers and reduce their dependency on a foreign workforce.
While the adoption of smart farming technologies is vital to reinvigorate the agriculture sector, Jay says the available solutions are not comprehensive enough.
“Indoor vertical farming can take the pressure off our natural resources with footprints in urban areas to enable seamless hyper-local, farm-to-table solutions for consumers. They complement traditional farming practices by focusing on import substitution. It’s the closest we have to a future-proof farming system that provides traceability and transparency.
“But it is still a long way from becoming commonplace simply because, without concerted support, they will not be able to achieve economies of scale fast enough. We are not just talking about faster market access but there is a whole range of seed and crop R&D that needs to happen, and it cannot happen in silos.”
As the 12MP is being rolled out, Jay hopes there will be more funding to drive an entire ecosystem for indoor precision farming “so that the current funding crunch for this fast-growing sector in the country is addressed; and so that we do not play catch-up to Singapore, which is investing hundreds of millions of dollars to build this industry”, she says.
Jay also hopes the precision farming sector will be considered a complementary solution to outdoor farming in addressing food security and safety, so that each farming model plays to its strengths and cultivates the right crops to optimise returns and minimise resource utilisation.
“Provide the right incentives and measures, and build a circular economy that will enable existing tech farm players to build their operational footprint, continue to enhance their tech offerings and eventually become regional players through validated and scalable technologies,” she says.
Save by subscribing to us for your print and/or digital copy.
P/S: The Edge is also available on Apple's App Store and Android's Google Play.